[wp-polyglots] Gravatar l10n request

Milan Dinić liste at srpski.biz
Wed Jun 23 17:10:30 UTC 2010


>
> > I also have the same question for the import plugins on
> translate.wordpress.org.
> > I've imported their translations from WordPress 2.9.2 and translated
> > one of them completely (UTW Importer) about a week ago, however the
> > language files are still not included in the plugin package.
>
> The plugin files are never included in the core package. If you go to
> Tools > Import on your 3.0 dashboard, you'll see that none are
> installed (as discussed before) and that you have the option to
> install them, which is when the plugin + language files are downloaded
> and installed.


I think you didn't understand, Ze. Sergey said that language files are not
included in *plugin* package, not *core* package.

Anyway, I just tried procedure you described (Tools > Import > Install
importer) but language files aren't downloaded.


BTW, Beau responded to my post on forum about Gravatar's deployment process
of translations.
http://en.forums.wordpress.com/topic/warnings-on-translations-with-plural-form?replies=17#post-478870


2010/6/23 José Fontainhas <jfontainhas at gmail.com>

> Ok
>
> I think we are talking about two different issues:
>
> > I also have the same question for the import plugins on
> translate.wordpress.org.
> > I've imported their translations from WordPress 2.9.2 and translated
> > one of them completely (UTW Importer) about a week ago, however the
> > language files are still not included in the plugin package.
>
> The plugin files are never included in the core package. If you go to
> Tools > Import on your 3.0 dashboard, you'll see that none are
> installed (as discussed before) and that you have the option to
> install them, which is when the plugin + language files are downloaded
> and installed.
>
> > I'd like to see the "Request deploy" feature in GlotPress for every
> > project, similar to the one being used on localized sites.
>
> Obviously, a "deploy" request for .org makes no sense, and as far as I
> can tell, .com deploy has been done at acceptable rates. .com deploys
> are not rosetta deploys (infrequent) and having to deal with a huge
> number of requests might prove unproductive.
>
> That said, I'm all for ideas on the subject
>
> Z
> _______________________________________________
> wp-polyglots mailing list
> wp-polyglots at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-polyglots
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.automattic.com/pipermail/wp-polyglots/attachments/20100623/16f347a2/attachment.htm>


More information about the wp-polyglots mailing list