[wp-xmlrpc] Updating Custom Fields Using metaWeblog.editPost
Joseph Scott
joseph at josephscott.org
Tue Apr 7 20:04:29 GMT 2009
On Apr 7, 2009, at 12:46 PM, David Weiss wrote:
> Daniel:
>
> "it also leads to the somewhat weird (to me) situation that custom
> fields can vary wildly across posts, and there is nothing to tie
> them together except the key names."
>
> I'm not sure what you're saying here. My understanding of custom
> fields is that by creating each field, you'll see the option to
> populate a field with the same name on a per post basis when using
> the UI. That makes it easy to use a custom field in a template -
> you just have to know what the custom field is you want to display.
He's just saying that there's nothing global about a key name. The
custom field "country" on post #12 isn't tied to the custom field
"country" on post #45 other than they happen to have the same name.
>
> It's definitely not "normalized" data - as someone pointed out in
> another thread, a type-o in creating a custom field will cause some
> issues for you. But for the time being, it would seem to me that
> knowing the field names should pretty much suffice for many users'
> needs. A better future solution might be to forget about the
> meta_id for the custom fields, and do create/update/delete based
> only on the name of the 'key'. Who really cares what the meta_id is
> anyway? For post 'X', if I supply a field named "Y", create it if
> it doesn't exist, update it if it does. To "delete" it, provide a
> null value for it, or do a lookup for it and remove the row from the
> table.
The reason for this because you can have duplicate keys, so the id is
required in order to uniquely identify a field. There's nothing to
stop you from having 25 custom fields on a post all with the same key
name.
>
> In my particular situation, doing a "get" on a post to discover the
> meta_ids only creates more server load and more load on the
> network. I have all the data I need in a local database, so being
> able to create/update/delete a custom field from a post would only
> take one POST to the server instead of a REQUEST and POST.
See the above, you don't actually have enough information to uniquely
identify a custom field until you get the id for it.
--
Joseph Scott
joseph at josephscott.org
http://josephscott.org/
More information about the wp-xmlrpc
mailing list