[wp-trac] [WordPress Trac] #60420: Default wordpress at site.com sender address can be problematic
WordPress Trac
noreply at wordpress.org
Sat Aug 2 11:01:12 UTC 2025
#60420: Default wordpress at site.com sender address can be problematic
-----------------------------+------------------------------
Reporter: thinlinecz | Owner: (none)
Type: feature request | Status: reopened
Priority: normal | Milestone: Awaiting Review
Component: Mail | Version: 1.5.1.2
Severity: normal | Resolution:
Keywords: close | Focuses:
-----------------------------+------------------------------
Changes (by SirLouen):
* keywords: => close
Comment:
Replying to [comment:16 desrosj]:
> However, maybe there is some mix of the following that can be explored:
> - Add a warning or info-level notice in Site Health educating the user
about how to make their site's email more reliable (seems like #62129 aims
to accomplish some form of that)
> - Possibly create a simple canonical plugin that helps site owners
control and adjust the appearance of their site emails without needing to
add their own filters.
> - Work with the Hosting team to better document this and explore
possible best practices to recommend. For example, I believe if the host
is in control of the name servers for the domain name and no email related
DNS entries are present, a forwarder could probably be set up by default.
Yes, this is mostly the summary of the conclusions we got in this report.
The idea was the following:
- I was planning to leave this report closed, mainly because the idea was
to do a new summary with all the information retrieved and create a new
clean report focusing on this specific target, building the Health Check.
- The canonical plugin is always an option, still I don't have a clear
guidance on how canonical plugins work from scratch (like where to start
implementing and all that)
- This was already in process, I already sent the
[https://github.com/WordPress/Advanced-administration-handbook/issues/406
report upstream] to Hosting and [https://github.com/WordPress/Advanced-
administration-handbook/pull/407 the corresponding PR] to activate this.
After this, I might be probably improving a bit the docs to make this
clearer.
Replying to [comment:17 michael.orlitzky]
> This is the hardest, because we absolutely still need an easily
configurable "From" address, and all of the plugins that are currently
using the site admin address as the "From" address are using it wrong.
This is what we have already been discussing all the way through. The
admin email is only meant to be a "To" address, mainly for notification
purposes regarding the administration level of the site. All inputted
emails (including other plugins in the ecosystem, like bbPress and
Buddypress), use any "saved in the DB" email as a To email. For the `From`
email, the solution was, as I said, using the filter.
You argue that the filter is not well documented in the front end, and
this is what we will be solved via Health Check and the Administration
docs. These happen to be the classic docs go-to within the administration
interface. As we already identified, changing this behaviour can provoke a
backwards compatibility trouble, and setting the admin email as the `From`
also collides, as I said, with the idea that this email could be mostly
anything the admin decides (for example, the admin's Gmail account).
Maybe we could also improve the copy for that, but again I would open a
new ticket for this specifically. Personally, I prefer [https://oandre.gal
/make-your-pull-requests-answer-a-single-question/ individual tickets for
each single thing] (working as much atomically as possible), that trying
to approach everything in a single shot.
This is why I would consider this a `close` candidate at least, once all
the new atomic tickets have been deployed.
--
Ticket URL: <https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/60420#comment:18>
WordPress Trac <https://core.trac.wordpress.org/>
WordPress publishing platform
More information about the wp-trac
mailing list