[wp-testers] Wordpress scaling problems
Engel Sanchez
engel at solunion.com
Thu Jan 29 21:28:10 GMT 2009
Thanks Paul... I think I will go with http://domain.com/%post_id%/%postname%
look prettier in the URL.
One question .... after this discussion about the wp pages "problem". Do
this affect plugins that are installed in ONE page and after that create
their own URL... example: www.domain.com/forum
In that case forum is a wp page, and a forum plugins is installed there...
same thing for a zillion plugins out there.
I have saw that the the method that have been used to expand wordpress in a
"drupal" way of things.. (like modules or special content).
Engel
2009/1/29 Paul Robinson <pablorobinson at gmail.com>
> Engel, my 2 cents (or pounds seeing as I'm in the UK) I've been using the
> first one for quite a long time in three blogs & google has always loved
> it.
> There might be a better way, but as far as I've seen it works great, not
> that there is much difference between the two versions.
>
> I've always wondered though, maybe one of you clever WP boffins can answer
> this? Is the mentioned permalink structure any better or worse than the
> classic year/month/day/postname structure?
>
> Also going back to the WP pages thing, my Dad (A health and medicine
> blogger) wanted to make a mini database of mental health based drugs using
> the WP page system. This would have reached into the hundreds of pages and
> I
> stopped him from doing it. After reading this compelling discussion I'm
> glad
> I did now. :)
>
> Paul.
>
> 2009/1/29 Engel Sanchez <engel at solunion.com>
>
> > After reading this interesting discussions now I will change permalinks
> for
> > a site I will launch next week that was based on %category% URL for
> posts.
> > And it should be a big site soon.
> >
> > So now I am planning to go with:
> >
> > http://domain.com/%postname%/%post_id%
> > or
> > http://domain.com/%postname%-%post_id%
> > or
> > http://domain.com/%post_id%/%postname%
> > or
> > http://domain.com/%post_id%-%postname%
> >
> > which one is better for performance, SEO?
> >
> > Engel
> >
> >
> > 2009/1/29 mrmist <listswptesters at mist.org.uk>
> >
> > > In message <
> 161617690901291054v249c043ch44c56affd3f22bf5 at mail.gmail.com
> > >,
> > > Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> writes
> > >
> > >> 1. Is it a page? select from wp_posts where post_slug = mypost and
> > >> post_type = page. Nope.
> > >>
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > >> 3. Is it a post? select from wp_posts where post_slug = mypost and
> > >> post_type = post. Bingo.
> > >>
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > Putting the rest of the post to one side for a moment, does WP actually
> > do
> > > this?
> > >
> > > If this is the actual way it works, and not just a bit of poetic
> licence,
> > > surely it should just do one query, select from wp_posts where
> post_slug
> > =
> > > mypost to determine if the slug being looked for exists as an object in
> > > wp_posts?
> > >
> > > *confused*
> > > --
> > > mrmist
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > wp-testers mailing list
> > > wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> > > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > wp-testers mailing list
> > wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
> >
> _______________________________________________
> wp-testers mailing list
> wp-testers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
>
--
Engel Sanchez
Solunion Group || Esfera Digital
www.solunion.com || www.esferadigital.com
E-mail: engel at solunion.com
More information about the wp-testers
mailing list