[wp-hackers] Varnish and WordPress
hovenko at linpro.no
Thu Aug 2 19:35:18 GMT 2007
In my case it is the other way around.
When using WP-Cache we got problems with Internet Explorer when redirecting
That's not the case with Varnish.
lifes because of Varnish.
For the record, we use memcache and xcache too.
On Thursday 02 August 2007 21:25:35 Demitrious S. Kelly wrote:
> To the best of my knowledge varnish does not work as a content
> accelerator with wordpress. Because of the flow of information through
> wordpress blogs (last-in-first-out) the entire blog (or at least very
> large chunks of it) would need to be invalidated for every
> add/edit/delete action. Because of the mutable URI structure of
> wordpress it difficult to generate a complete list of URI/URLs that
> might have changed because of a given action. This, mixed with the fact
> that (afaik) varnish does not allow wild card invalidations, only
> specific URI/URL invalidations, makes varnish less than ideal as a
> content accelerator for WP. We're working on a project called WPCP which
> should alleviate this problem for very large shops for whom wp-cache is
> too unruly. For now, wp-cache is still your safest bet.
> Paveo Chen wrote:
> > Varnish like Squid and eAccelerator like APC,
> > that's not the same :)
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
Systemutvikler mob: +47 986 71 700
Linpro AS http://www.linpro.no/
More information about the wp-hackers