[wp-hackers] MU Wordpress?

Stuart amanzimtoti at gmail.com
Wed Apr 5 22:36:59 GMT 2006

Thanks for sticking up for me Chris. I took Matt's response as a
brush-off which is why I asked if someone else knew. To me it was a
sensible question and I was hoping for a sensible response.
And I still don't know when it will be back...

On 4/6/06, Robert Deaton <false.hopes at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/5/06, Chris Lott <chris.lott at gmail.com> wrote:
> > A point which didn't need to be made (clearly it will be back someday)
> It obviously did need to be made, otherwise there wouldn't have been a
> reponse saying:
> > "For some value of tomorrow." didn't seem to make sense
> > to me..??
> > and whose smug and sarcastic uselesness in response to a valid
> > question characterizes a lot of what turns people off when they
> > encounter the WP community. Imagine getting that answer to a question
> > that was important to YOU?
> If I didn't understand, and someone explained it to me, I wouldn't be
> quite as pissed as this mail, I'd be happy that someone stepped aside
> and took the time to explain something. Your anger seems to stem from
> something else, if you're pissed about the way the community is, open
> another thread, don't go on about it to a perfectly fine response
> here.
> >
> > There are at least a half-dozen professional, useful answers that
> > ought to come to mind before what was given. After all, presumably
> > "the man himself" was at least aware of-- if not responsible for-- the
> > fact that a specific date was given and an implied promise
> > unfulfilled, giving rise to the obvious and polite question.
> And the question was answered in a not rude and sarcastic way. I
> explained what was meant by "for some value of tomorrow." Where that
> comes off as sarcastic, I still fail to see, but as there wasn't a
> response as I skimmed the replies that explained this in a clear,
> concise way, I explained it.
> Perhaps your anger is slightly misdirected, it wasn't my choice that
> its not fixed today, I simply explained what Matt meant in his
> original response. I'm sorry my response wasn't outlined in hearts
> with a wonderful "I'm so sorry its not fixed even though I have
> nothing to do with the fact that its broken" apology note attached at
> the top.
> --
> --Robert Deaton
> http://somethingunpredictable.com
> _______________________________________________
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers

More information about the wp-hackers mailing list