[wp-forums] ... can't be 301 (lesbian)

[Mark Ratledge]

I wanted to, since most people here have been around longer than I.

Is there a reason or need for an outline in the http://make.wordpress.org/support/handbook/forum-moderator/ for what we consider NSFW and not?

On Dec 30, 2012, at 11:16 PM, Japheth Thomson wrote:

> Fair enough. It's always good to ensure consensus.
> 
> The links aren't being rendered as links for me, so I would think back
> links aren't an issue. Unless they are being rendered for others.
> 
> Cheers,
> Japh
> 
> 
> On 31 December 2012 17:12, Mark Ratledge <mark at markratledge.com> wrote:
> 
>> Sure, it's just a word. And in a perfect world it wouldn't bother anyone.
>> But it's not, and the WP forums are public. This kind of vocabulary point
>> has been discussed before, so thats why I put it out here. And the links
>> are acting as lots of back links, too. -- Mark
>> 
>> On Dec 30, 2012, at 9:14 PM, Japheth Thomson wrote:
>> 
>>> Neither. Why would it need a NSFW flag or editing of the URLs?
>>> 
>>> "Lesbian" is just a word, and it's not being used in any sort of
>> salacious
>>> way.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Japh
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 31 December 2012 13:39, Mark Ratledge <mark at markratledge.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> http://wordpress.org/support/topic/rewriterules-for-old-html-pages-cant-be-301-lesbian?replies=2
>>>> 
>>>> Question: Does this need a NSFW flag or do the URLs need to be edited?
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> wp-forums mailing list
>> wp-forums at lists.automattic.com
>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-forums
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Japh Thomson
> WordPress Evangelist
> http://wp.envato.com
> http://twitter.com/envato
> _______________________________________________
> wp-forums mailing list
> wp-forums at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-forums