[wp-forums] ... can't be 301 (lesbian)

[Japheth Thomson]

Fair enough. It's always good to ensure consensus.

The links aren't being rendered as links for me, so I would think back
links aren't an issue. Unless they are being rendered for others.

Cheers,
Japh


On 31 December 2012 17:12, Mark Ratledge <mark at markratledge.com> wrote:

> Sure, it's just a word. And in a perfect world it wouldn't bother anyone.
> But it's not, and the WP forums are public. This kind of vocabulary point
> has been discussed before, so thats why I put it out here. And the links
> are acting as lots of back links, too. -- Mark
>
> On Dec 30, 2012, at 9:14 PM, Japheth Thomson wrote:
>
> > Neither. Why would it need a NSFW flag or editing of the URLs?
> >
> > "Lesbian" is just a word, and it's not being used in any sort of
> salacious
> > way.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Japh
> >
> >
> >
> > On 31 December 2012 13:39, Mark Ratledge <mark at markratledge.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> http://wordpress.org/support/topic/rewriterules-for-old-html-pages-cant-be-301-lesbian?replies=2
> >>
> >> Question: Does this need a NSFW flag or do the URLs need to be edited?
>
> _______________________________________________
> wp-forums mailing list
> wp-forums at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-forums
>



-- 
Japh Thomson
WordPress Evangelist
http://wp.envato.com
http://twitter.com/envato