Re: Re: [wp-forums] This needs debating please

[tg at tannagh.com]

And that last link of his:
http://wordpress.org/support/topic/44347#post-247684

Really, was *that* necessary?

-tg

Podz <podz at tamba2.org.uk> wrote on 09/12/2005, 03:57:35 PM:
> Scott Merrill wrote:
> > Sweet, I win!  ;)
> Yup !
> 
> > Yes, I saw that, too.  A lot of people, for whatever reason, don't want
> > to post links to their blogs.
> I suspect that we are seeing an increase in the "They'll answer it for 
> you even though it's not WP / you've not got WP". That's why I'm 
> increasingly looking for IP's and posting history.
> While lots of answers are good, broadness isn't for me.
> 
> > 
> > I support a more aggressive thread locking policy.  If it's clearly a
> > non-WordPress issue (even the liberal "on-topic" definition I try to
> > use), lock the thread with an explanation.
> > 
> Cool.
> 
> > 
> >>I don't disagree with your work Skippy, but then what if I had posted
> >>about my router problem ? After all, no router = no wp = problem.
> > 
> > I'd give you a snarky response about contacting the manufacturer, just
> > like we often give snarky responses to contact one's hosting provider.  =)
> > 
> I did - belkin support does lack at times ... D-Link ? Netgear ? :p
> 
> > I'm certain, though, that this grnaularity would be lost on most users,
> > and wouldn't actually solve any problems.
> > 
> > So I'm perfectly okay with moving posts to "Miscellaneous", and will
> > also support a more aggressive locking policy.
> > 
> Sounds like a plan :)
> 
> P>
> _______________________________________________
> wp-forums mailing list
> wp-forums at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-forums