[wp-docs] Theme Frameworks Codex Entry
Lorelle on WordPress
lorelleonwordpress at gmail.com
Thu Apr 5 17:44:15 UTC 2012
LOL! Do I win something? :D
Please fix it up with the information I missed or whatever. I just grabbed
what I could find to help flesh it out to help people understand what the
page was about.
Lorelle
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
> Thanks for adding the intro for me, Lorelle. I went in today to follow up,
> and saw that you beat me by just a couple days. ;)
>
> Chip
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Lorelle on WordPress <
> lorelleonwordpress at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sorry for the delay. We've had storms passing through and electricity has
>> been hit and miss much of last week and I'm still catching up with emails.
>>
>> http://codex.wordpress.org/Codex:Contributing
>>
>> http://codex.wordpress.org/Codex:Styles
>>
>> http://codex.wordpress.org/Codex:Guidelines
>>
>> The style guide is pretty specific. It needs to open with a descriptive
>> paragraph so people will understand the purpose of the page, which is what
>> this page needs. The rest is fine. It would then match the look and feel of
>> all the pages on the Codex.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Lorelle
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>>
>>> Can you link those format guidelines for me? I'll be happy to bring the
>>> Theme Review page up to standard.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Chip
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Lorelle on WordPress <
>>> lorelleonwordpress at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The Theme Review page doesn't meet the basic format guidelines of the
>>>> Codex which begins with an explanation on what the page is about. It's
>>>> importance is not in question, and I'm sorry that it escaped attention this
>>>> long. A simple "this is about x, y, z" is all that is needed at the top
>>>> with a few formatting changes to make it match the consistency of the
>>>> Codex.
>>>>
>>>> Lorelle
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Jane Wells <jane at automattic.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/14/12 10:46 PM, Chip Bennett wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> What are you wanting to edit on that one? Please tread lightly; Theme
>>>>>> developers have been using that list for almost two years now as THE
>>>>>> "go-to" source for Theme Review requirements. Any content changes would
>>>>>> have a major impact to ongoing reviews.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Chip
>>>>>>
>>>>> Agreed. This page really needs to be owned by the theme review team.
>>>>> The only outside edits should be for things like spelling or typos.
>>>>>
>>>>> j
>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>>> wp-docs mailing list
>>>>> wp-docs at lists.automattic.com
>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/**mailman/listinfo/wp-docs<http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> wp-docs mailing list
>>>> wp-docs at lists.automattic.com
>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> wp-docs mailing list
>>> wp-docs at lists.automattic.com
>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wp-docs mailing list
>> wp-docs at lists.automattic.com
>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wp-docs mailing list
> wp-docs at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.automattic.com/pipermail/wp-docs/attachments/20120405/2ee25ff1/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the wp-docs
mailing list