[wp-docs] Theme Frameworks Codex Entry

[Chip Bennett]

Thanks for adding the intro for me, Lorelle. I went in today to follow up,
and saw that you beat me by just a couple days. ;)

Chip

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Lorelle on WordPress <
lorelleonwordpress at gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry for the delay. We've had storms passing through and electricity has
> been hit and miss much of last week and I'm still catching up with emails.
>
> http://codex.wordpress.org/Codex:Contributing
>
> http://codex.wordpress.org/Codex:Styles
>
> http://codex.wordpress.org/Codex:Guidelines
>
> The style guide is pretty specific. It needs to open with a descriptive
> paragraph so people will understand the purpose of the page, which is what
> this page needs. The rest is fine. It would then match the look and feel of
> all the pages on the Codex.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lorelle
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>
>> Can you link those format guidelines for me? I'll be happy to bring the
>> Theme Review page up to standard.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Chip
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Lorelle on WordPress <
>> lorelleonwordpress at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The Theme Review page doesn't meet the basic format guidelines of the
>>> Codex which begins with an explanation on what the page is about. It's
>>> importance is not in question, and I'm sorry that it escaped attention this
>>> long. A simple "this is about x, y, z" is all that is needed at the top
>>> with a few formatting changes to make it match the consistency of the
>>> Codex.
>>>
>>> Lorelle
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Jane Wells <jane at automattic.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/14/12 10:46 PM, Chip Bennett wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What are you wanting to edit on that one? Please tread lightly; Theme
>>>>> developers have been using that list for almost two years now as THE
>>>>> "go-to" source for Theme Review requirements. Any content changes would
>>>>> have a major impact to ongoing reviews.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Chip
>>>>>
>>>> Agreed. This page really needs to be owned by the theme review team.
>>>> The only outside edits should be for things like spelling or typos.
>>>>
>>>> j
>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>> wp-docs mailing list
>>>> wp-docs at lists.automattic.com
>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/**mailman/listinfo/wp-docs<http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> wp-docs mailing list
>>> wp-docs at lists.automattic.com
>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wp-docs mailing list
>> wp-docs at lists.automattic.com
>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wp-docs mailing list
> wp-docs at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.automattic.com/pipermail/wp-docs/attachments/20120405/3947ea04/attachment.htm>