[wp-forums] ... can't be 301 (lesbian)

[Mika A Epstein]

We could propose a rephrase of those sections on Make/Support. It may 
not be a bad idea to go through that, section at a time, to see if we 
can clarify things that make sense to us dinos but not the newbies.

Jane Wells wrote:
>
> On 12/31/12 2:09 PM, Mark Ratledge wrote:
>>
>> Is there a reason or need for an outline in the
>> http://make.wordpress.org/support/handbook/forum-moderator/ for what
>> we consider NSFW and not?
>>
>
> It probably wouldn't hurt in general (references are always good), but
> seriously, the word "lesbian" is safe for work. Unless you want to
> propose that "heterosexual" is also considered NSFW, I hope that this
> settles the issue. Realistically, what would be useful is not a a list
> of what's considered NSFW for moderators on the make site, but a
> "what's considered appropriate language" for forum participants.
> Probably we could just add to
> http://codex.wordpress.org/Forum_Welcome#The_Bad_Stuff
> and http://codex.wordpress.org/Forum_Welcome#Warn_About_Adult_Content
> if needed.
>
> _______________________________________________
> wp-forums mailing list
> wp-forums at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-forums