[wp-forums] Ethical practices of consultants

James Huff macmanx at gmail.com
Thu Jul 1 00:54:23 UTC 2010


I think we should start with 30%, but this is really a good reason for why I think that evidence should be send to us for deliberation before blacklisting anyone.

________
James Huff
http://www.macmanx.com
http://programnotes.wikia.com

On Jun 30, 2010, at 5:35 PM, Joni Mueller wrote:

> As a WP Consultant myself, I have a few comments to these, if I may.  See below at JONI. :)
> 
> Joni Mueller
> Pixelita Designs
> http://www.pixelita.com
> ________________________________________
> On Behalf Of James Huff [macmanx at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 7:21 PM
> To: wp-forums at lists.automattic.com
> Subject: Re: [wp-forums] Ethical practices of consultants
> 
> Very good questions.
> 
> Here are my "qualifications" for unethical status:
> 
> [snipped]
> 
> 4. The consultant dramatically increases the final price after the job is finished.
> JONI:  Ever hear of "scope creep"?  Need to make clear that the "dramatic" increase in the final price is NOT as a result of the client packing on more work for the web professional.  And "dramatic" increase needs to be defined, perhaps as a percentage (20? 30?) more than the original, agreed-upon price.  
> 
> My two cents.
> 
> [snipped]
> _______________________________________________
> wp-forums mailing list
> wp-forums at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-forums



More information about the wp-forums mailing list