[wp-forums] The free thing again.

[Jesse S]

I wasn't saying we should get rid of the into, I meant that the front page
has the into on it, and then we have an "inro" page with the exact same
text. we don't need two pages for the same three paragraphs of text...

On 5/17/06, Petit <petit at petitpub.com> wrote:
>
> My thoughts on this:
> o It looks good and well thought through to me.
> o The introductory page should definitely stay. It sorts out the
> responsibilities in no uncertain terms, before the questioner is thrown
> into the nitti gtitty of the process.
>    We need that as a staring point.
> o Under "We will:" we could add: give advice on how to change your
> passwords, once the install is done. ( giving more security for the blog
> owner )
> o If we are going to make the install, we should have access to the
> MySQL account and create the database.
> o About "People involved! [do we give email addresses?] No! We contact
> them - at that point they get the email address.
>    If we say people on the list are trusted, we don't have to list real
> names. We can give nicky names ( up to the installer )
>
> /Petit
>
> TechGnome wrote:
> > Good start.... one thing I notice that's missing... who's responsible
> > for creating the database?
> > It's neither in the What We Won't Do nor in the What We Will Do
> sections.
> >
> > Regarding the "People Involved" page.... I'm not sure about naming
> > names, and email addresses are right out. This is to protect our
> > integrity and privacy. 1) People will think they can email us
> > directly. 2) Some enterprising spammer could spoof email from anyone
> > listed, making for some bad juju.
> >
> > Instead how about a para about how we are just a bunch of community
> > volunteers who have been recognized by their peers as being honest,
> > trustworthy and that this is our way of giving back to the community.
> >
> > The Process page needs to outline step-by-step exactly how the process
> > will work.  It should also appear before the Contact page, and
> > possibly "sign" or check off something that yes, they "Read" it and
> > understand how it works. You know, the usual EULA type of sign here we
> > all blindly click when we install something.
> >
> > -tg
> >
> >
> > Jesse S wrote:
> >> It looks pretty good. I think the "Introduction" page is fairly
> >> superfluous
> >> and can be gotten rid of seeing as we have the info on the home page.
> >>
> >> Other than that it looks fine other than a wee bit of tweaking with the
> >> wording, and, of course, the form
> >>
> >> On 5/17/06, Podz <podz at tamba2.org.uk> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> http://www.tamba2.org.uk/install/
> >>>
> >>> (if you want to edit that, add stuff etc then email me for the login)
> >>>
> >>> Can anyone help with the contact page/security code thing?
> >>> If we have that then apart from a bit of minor polish I think we'd be
> >>> good enough to start?
> >>>
> >>> There is bound to be something that through experience we have to
> alter
> >>> but that's true for all things.
> >>>
> >>> So - a bit of code? Please :)
> >>>
> >>> Podz
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> wp-forums mailing list
> >>> wp-forums at lists.automattic.com
> >>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-forums
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> wp-forums mailing list
> >> wp-forums at lists.automattic.com
> >> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-forums
> > _______________________________________________
> > wp-forums mailing list
> > wp-forums at lists.automattic.com
> > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-forums
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> wp-forums mailing list
> wp-forums at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-forums
>