[wp-xmlrpc] exposing and manipulating custom fields

[Joseph Scott]

On Nov 13, 2007, at 9:08 AM, Dougal Campbell wrote:

> If the new method is going to follow the same overload functionality
> (add, modify, or delete, depending on the state of the arguments),  
> then
> I was recommend naming it 'setCustomField' rather than  
> 'addCustomField'.
> I'm not arguing for or against overloading, just suggesting that 'set'
> is more generic than 'add' for a function that does more than just add
> values.

Agreed.

--
Joseph Scott
http://joseph.randomnetworks.com/