[wp-trac] [WordPress Trac] #60420: Default wordpress at site.com sender address can be problematic
WordPress Trac
noreply at wordpress.org
Tue Dec 16 02:08:10 UTC 2025
#60420: Default wordpress at site.com sender address can be problematic
-----------------------------+------------------------------
Reporter: thinlinecz | Owner: (none)
Type: feature request | Status: reopened
Priority: normal | Milestone: Awaiting Review
Component: Mail | Version: 1.5.1.2
Severity: normal | Resolution:
Keywords: close | Focuses:
-----------------------------+------------------------------
Comment (by dmsnell):
Every time I dig deeper into this general topic the list of tickets
expands the emotional heat increases š
Letās do our best to remain professional; this is a passionate topic for
folks, and I want to stress that it will be most helpful if we stick to
our own experience and not attempt to speak for others, whether asserting
the motivations we assume they must have or the assumption that something
that seems clear to us is obvious to others or even accurate.
> WordPress can only stand with "golden rules", not with all the theories
that help you push up your rankings or like in this case, help
deliverability based on some "relatively well known rules"ā¦
I want to pause and hopefully direct the energy into what I want to see us
all work towards: that wherever we have control, we can improve the
ecosystem together, even when that means going beyond or in contrast to
RFCs and other specs.
What matters most to me is that inasmuch as we are able, that we can find
ways to improve mail deliverability and influence each other towards more
robust configurations and systems. Sometimes really good things come from
solving the problem āat the wrong end of the chain of responsibility.ā
> WordPress is meant to simplify the life of the exemplary users not the
system administrators that should have all the tools in the world to make
things happen
Email is collective problem and I want us to find ways to help end users
//and// system administrators.
> A simple canonical plugin to change the From to whatever is probably the
best solution for those who do not make their own or use SMTP plugins
This seems like the correct state of things, apart from the fact that
thereās no ācanonicalā part, but since the plugin to workaround the issue
is so small, I donāt know how much it would rise to the level of needing a
canonical adoption.
----
Thank you all for sharing your expertise on this, by the way. There are
some questions I have right now after getting through this and a few other
related tickets on the matter:
- Do any of us we have real metrics from 6.9 to indicate if the change to
adding a default Envelope Return-Path to `wordpress at host()` was a net help
or hindrance for deliverability? I understand that some mail hosts are
concerned about long-term IP reputation, but this problem has wildly
different imperatives if we fixed 80% of mail issues and created 2% new
problems, vs if we solved 5% of mail issues and created 60%. I made up
those numbers. The point is without knowing these numbers itās near-
impossible to agree where we stand. A revert of the change could be
warranted, but considering how all of the discussion led us a bit astray
in the original ticket, I would like to see some substantiation for the
claims before we overreact and removed what could be a net win, albeit
with its own unintended consequences that still need to be worked out.
- Do we have any tools through `.well-known` directories, DNS, or at the
host-level which could be used to communicate into WordPress to establish
a better Return-Path?
- If you are a host dealing with this issue, what technically makes it
easier to work with WordPress emails that are sent with
`systemuser at local.system.hostname` than `wordpress at public.hostname()`?
- If you are a host dealing with this issue, do you send all bounce
emails to the same address for all hosted sites? Are there any potential
privacy issues with this practice? How does receipt of bounce messages and
DMARC notices get relayed to the site owner?
- āI do not think WordPress should be making any attempt to test the
deliverability of the addressā @mvl22 would you care to share more about
why? in the case that email is setup appropriately, would it be difficult
to positively identify a proper return-path address? in which cases would
an attempt be misleading? in other words, I would imagine that a failure
to detect delivery might not say anything, but a confirmation of delivery
//would//. I have no idea how to detect deliverability so maybe you are
saying WordPress doesnāt have an avenue to do so?
From my perspective, adding a Site Health section for email sounds like a
high-priority task to start working towards a better future. Even if all
we do is highlight that there is no Return-Path set, that provides the
starting communication to direct people to where to figure this out.
Thereās a nice-looking mockup of the first step in #62129.
----
Final reminders, and this is not specifically for this ticket, but based
on discussion in this and related tickets: please refrain from suggesting
that if people have a different perspective on this problem that they are
ignorant of some knowledge you hold; please refrain from suggesting that
if people were knowledgeable that they //must// agree with your ideas of
how this ought to be; please refrain from making declarations how someone
else feels, reacts, thinks, or works.
We should remember that if the solutions were easy or straightforward it
would not be likely that we would have years of attempts and debate on how
to resolve this. Everything we do will likely make someoneās job more
difficult; hopefully as we progress we minimize that ā this is //exactly//
why weāre discussing this, because we all want toĀ solve this problem.
--
Ticket URL: <https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/60420#comment:39>
WordPress Trac <https://core.trac.wordpress.org/>
WordPress publishing platform
More information about the wp-trac
mailing list