[wp-polyglots] french translation
Morgan Doocy
morgan at doocy.net
Sat Feb 19 08:38:21 GMT 2005
I ran mine through msgfmt too and found one error that needed
correcting, on line 2942. However, after I uploaded it and downloaded
it again, the new PO file Rosetta gives me generates errors. For
whatever reason, Rosetta seems to be tacking on two "obsolete" [1]
messages to the end:
#: wp-admin/options-general.php:32
#~ msgid ""
#~ "If you want your blog homepage to be different than the directory
you "
#~ "installed WordPress in, enter that address here."
#~ msgstr ""
#~ "Si vous voulez que l’adresse de la page d’accueil de
votre "
#~ "weblog soit différente du répertoire où vous avez installé
WordPress, entrez "
#~ "cette adresse ici."
#: wp-admin/themes.php:57
#~ msgid ""
#~ "Themes are usually downloaded separately from WordPress. To install
a theme "
#~ "you generally just need to put the theme file or files into your
<code>wp- "
#~ "content/themes</code> directory. Once a theme is installed, you may
select "
#~ "it here."
#~ msgstr ""
#~ "Les thèmes sont en principe téléchargés séparément de WordPress.
Pour "
#~ "installer un thème, il vous faut en général simplement mettre le ou
les "
#~ "fichier(s) du thème dans votre répertoire
<code>wp-content/themes</code> "
#~ "directory. Une fois le thème installé, vous pouvez le sélectionner
ici."
These are duplicates of messages that are declared at separate points
earlier in the file. If you delete these two messages, it compiles
without error. I've tried re-uploading it with these removed, but
Rosetta seems to just keep adding them back. I don't know what the deal
is, but I don't think overwriting it with your copy would fix it.
[1]
http://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/manual/html_mono/
gettext.html#SEC106
Morgan
On Feb 19, 2005, at 12:23 AM, Fairweb wrote:
> No problem.
> I imported your file in poEdit and get fatal errors :
> lines 1470 - 1776 I have corrected them
>
> also 2744 and 4003 but could not find where these lines are so I
> cannot
> compile into .mo (probably why we have a problem downloading the mo
> from
> Rosetta)
>
> Missing translation lines
> 963 and 1087 I have added them
>
> The version I have yesterday was errorless. If you want I can upload
> it and
> we could replace the accents and apostrophies from this end. what do
> you
> think ?
>
> Myriam
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Morgan Doocy" <morgan at doocy.net>
> To: <wp-polyglots at lists.automattic.com>
> Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 7:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [wp-polyglots] french translation
>
>
> :-( Sorry, I didn't realize you were doing that. Hopefully the
> repository will be up soon, so we can avoid this sort of thing.
>
> Morgan
>
> On Feb 18, 2005, at 10:48 PM, Fairweb wrote:
>
>>
>> We did double work Morgan :(
>>
>> However we'll stick to your as it's online and as you dealt with the
>> apostrophies which I did not do.
>>
>> Myriam
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Morgan Doocy" <morgan at doocy.net>
>> To: <wp-polyglots at lists.automattic.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 4:07 AM
>> Subject: Re: [wp-polyglots] french translation
>>
>>
>> I did some grep editing of the PO file and uploaded it back to
>> Rosetta.
>> Here are the updates I made:
>>
>> - Updated all accent character entities to use literal characters.
>> Found some incorrect entities while I was at it (lots of ´ and
>> one &eaacute;).
>> - Made sure that all ' :' used ' :'
>> - Corrected a few spots where the translation didn't have a space
>> before a colon, but probably didn't get them all (there are so many
>> colons in the file, it would take forever to grep through them all)
>> - Corrected a few '<b />' to '<br />'
>> - Changed 'billet' to 'article', since we seemed to be settling on
>> that, and corrected the articles accordingly ("du" => "de l'", "ce" =>
>> "cet", etc.). (If I jumped the gun on this, I'll be happy to fix
>> them.)
>> - Updated all translations containing apostrophes to use ’, if
>> the source message either didn't have any apostrophes at all, or also
>> used ’. All translations whose source message uses non-curly
>> apostrophes, still use non-curly apostrophes.
>> - Someone had actually inserted a few ↵'s in one message, so I took
>> those out. (They didn't mean to use that literally! :-P )
>>
>> Now for the grammatical editing! Woo!
>>
>> Morgan
>>
>> On Feb 18, 2005, at 2:29 PM, Morgan Doocy wrote:
>>
>>> Wow! That's awesome! Geez, I didn't even get a chance to go back and
>>> help, that was so quick.
>>>
>>> You guys rule.
>>>
>>> Morgan
>>>
>>> On Feb 18, 2005, at 6:26 AM, Xavier Borderie wrote:
>>>
>>>>> We're almost there !
>>>>> 3 lines lefts !
>>>>
>>>> 100% done on Rosetta
>>>> Apparenlty we are working at the same time =)
>>>> Now this needs proofreading, I guess...
>>>>
>>>> x.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> wp-polyglots mailing list
>>>> wp-polyglots at lists.automattic.com
>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-polyglots
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> wp-polyglots mailing list
>>> wp-polyglots at lists.automattic.com
>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-polyglots
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wp-polyglots mailing list
>> wp-polyglots at lists.automattic.com
>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-polyglots
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wp-polyglots mailing list
>> wp-polyglots at lists.automattic.com
>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-polyglots
>
> _______________________________________________
> wp-polyglots mailing list
> wp-polyglots at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-polyglots
>
> _______________________________________________
> wp-polyglots mailing list
> wp-polyglots at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-polyglots
More information about the wp-polyglots
mailing list