[wp-hackers] array_push on update_user_meta
Gregory Lancaster
greglancaster71 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 31 22:23:09 UTC 2013
Ah i see. The wordpress codex is inexpendable to me right now haha, I dont
have all this stuff programmed into my brain yet.
So for the unfollow option, I will be using unset right? and there isnt
any special magic or voodoo I should know about here?
unset($reChkMetaValue[ $profileID ]);
I have unset arrays before in class, but never a wordpress serialized
array. Same thing?
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:33 PM, J.D. Grimes <jdg at codesymphony.co> wrote:
> Yes, that is what was happening with the arrays, because each time you
> pulled the value out of the database, it was being wrapped in an array
> (because get_user_meta() was pulling the values for all ‘friends’ keys for
> the user). You added one user ID to it, and then put it back. That was
> happening each time you followed a user. Now that it is working correctly,
> the array will be only one layer deep. I remember coming up against this
> thing with get_user_meta() myself once when I was first learning WP
> development. :-)
>
> On Oct 31, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Gregory Lancaster <greglancaster71 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > did I really spend a couple hours reading for a solution over the word
> > true. Thank you JD. Real quick, you said:
> >
> > When you call in_array() it is checking if the user ID (say, 3 ) is in
> the
> > outer array. But it isn’t, the only thing in it is another array. When
> you
> > call get_user_meta() with the third parameter set to true, the returned
> > value won’t be wrapped in the outer array like that, so it will work.
> >
> > Why are arrays stored so many tiers deep like that? Is this a wordpress
> > only thing, or is this normal? It looks like everytime a persons ID is
> > added, another instance of array(array(array( is added. What is the
> > reasoning behind this? Or do I understand it incorrectly?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:22 PM, J.D. Grimes <jdg at codesymphony.co>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Ah.. We forgot to add true to the gat_user_meta() in
> >> my_add_friend_action(). Add that and you should be good to go.
> >>
> >> On Oct 31, 2013, at 5:18 PM, Gregory Lancaster <
> greglancaster71 at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Sure;
> >>>
> >>> add_action('wp_ajax_my_add_friend_action', 'my_add_friend_action');
> >>> add_action('wp_ajax_nopriv_my_add_friend_action',
> >> 'my_add_friend_action');
> >>> function my_add_friend_action() {
> >>> global $wpdb;
> >>> $profileID = $_POST['profileID'];
> >>> $userID = $_POST['userID'];
> >>>
> >>> $chkMetaValue = get_user_meta($userID,"friends");
> >>> if ( ! is_array($chkMetaValue) )
> >>> $chkMetaValue = array();
> >>> $chkMetaValue[] = $profileID;
> >>>
> >>> // activity_tracker($current_user, 'added_friend', 'prof');
> >>> update_user_meta( $userID, 'friends', $chkMetaValue );
> >>> $response = array( 'success' => true );
> >>> wp_send_json_success($response);
> >>> die();
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> function follow_status($author_id) {
> >>> global $wpdb, $current_user;
> >>> get_currentuserinfo();
> >>>
> >>> //authorID is the userID of the profile owner
> >>>
> >>> $active_user = $current_user->ID;
> >>> $active_user_friends = get_user_meta($active_user, 'friends', true);
> >>>
> >>> if (in_array($author_id, $active_user_friends)) {
> >>> $follow_status = "<button id='remove_friend'>Remove Friend</button>";
> >>> } else {
> >>> $follow_status = "<button id='add_friend'>Add Friend</button>";
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> return $follow_status;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> and calling in the profile page with:
> >>>
> >>> echo follow_status($author_id);
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:16 PM, J.D. Grimes <jdg at codesymphony.co>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Could you post your code again? Somewhere you are still getting the
> >> value
> >>>> wrapped in an extra array.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Oct 31, 2013, at 5:08 PM, Gregory Lancaster <
> >> greglancaster71 at gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> No I must have screwed something up man, it only shows the last
> value.
> >> I
> >>>>> searched for awhile before responding here, and I see some people say
> >>>>> in_array adds a line between items and sometimes other folks needed
> to
> >>>>> strip those. But I have no idea if thats whats going on here. It
> all
> >>>>> looks like it should function. :-/ Maybe I need to get off the
> >> computer
> >>>>> for awhile.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I var_dump using the function you shared, and this is what the friend
> >>>> array
> >>>>> looks like from there:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> array(2) {\n [0]=>\n array(2) {\n [0]=>\n array(2) {\n
> >>>> [0]=>\n
> >>>>> array(2) {\n [0]=>\n array(2) {\n [0]=>\n
> >>>>> array(1) {\n [0]=>\n string(1) "1"\n
> >> }\n
> >>>>> [1]=>\n string(1) "9"\n }\n [1]=>\n
> >>>>> string(2) "13"\n }\n [1]=>\n string(2) "16"\n }\n
> >>>>> [1]=>\n string(2) "13"\n }\n [1]=>\n string(1) "3"\n}\n
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I dont know if that assists in debugging.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:52 PM, J.D. Grimes <jdg at codesymphony.co>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> OK, you need to just delete that meta row and start over. It is
> messed
> >>>> up
> >>>>>> from before. Do that and see if it works.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Oct 31, 2013, at 4:49 PM, Gregory Lancaster <
> >>>> greglancaster71 at gmail.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I have it set to true:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> $active_user_friends = get_user_meta($active_user, 'friends',
> true);
> >>>>>>> But the issue is that it only shows the "friended" code for the
> last
> >>>>>> user I
> >>>>>>> added. If I click add on one profile, and then to a second, the
> >> first
> >>>> no
> >>>>>>> longer shows friend added. Even if I have clearly added several to
> >> the
> >>>>>>> array:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> a:2:{i:0;a:2:{i:0;a:2:{i:0;a:2:{i:0;a:2:{i:0;a:2:{i:0;s:0:"";i:1;s:2:"16";}i:1;s:2:"12";}i:1;s:2:"13";}i:1;s:2:"12";}i:1;s:1:"3";}i:1;s:2:"13";}
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:40 PM, J.D. Grimes <jdg at codesymphony.co>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> No, you don’t need to use unserialize, that is all done
> >> automatically
> >>>> by
> >>>>>>>> the WordPress functions.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> In the code you posted you still aren’t calling get_user_meta()
> with
> >>>> the
> >>>>>>>> third parameter set to true. You need to do that. Right now the
> >> array
> >>>>>> it is
> >>>>>>>> returning looks something like this:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> array(
> >>>>>>>> 0 => array( 3, 45, 6, 33 )
> >>>>>>>> )
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> When you call in_array() it is checking if the user ID (say, 3 )
> is
> >> in
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> outer array. But it isn’t, the only thing in it is another array.
> >> When
> >>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>> call get_user_meta() with the third parameter set to true, the
> >>>> returned
> >>>>>>>> value won’t be wrapped in the outer array like that, so it will
> >> work.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Oct 31, 2013, at 4:30 PM, Gregory Lancaster <
> >>>>>> greglancaster71 at gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Ah I see. Thank you for explaining JD. It sounds like maybe the
> >>>> easier
> >>>>>>>>> option is to just create a separate table to store the friends
> list
> >>>> in.
> >>>>>>>>> Trying to work with user_meta this way seems like a bad idea.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Quick question, should I be using unserialize to check the array
> >>>> values
> >>>>>>>>> using in_array? Because right now this code isnt working. Thats
> >> the
> >>>>>>>> only
> >>>>>>>>> thing that seems to be left out - but when I tried using
> >> $unserialize
> >>>>>>>> like
> >>>>>>>>> this:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> $unserialize = unserialize($active_user_friends);
> >>>>>>>>> if (in_array($author_id, $unserialize)) {
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> it says this:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> *Warning*: unserialize() expects parameter 1 to be string, array
> >>>> given
> >>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>> *Warning*: in_array() expects parameter 2 to be array, boolean
> >> given
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --------
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> add_action('wp_ajax_my_add_friend_action',
> 'my_add_friend_action');
> >>>>>>>>> add_action('wp_ajax_nopriv_my_add_friend_action',
> >>>>>>>> 'my_add_friend_action');
> >>>>>>>>> function my_add_friend_action() {
> >>>>>>>>> global $wpdb;
> >>>>>>>>> $profileID = $_POST['profileID'];
> >>>>>>>>> $userID = $_POST['userID'];
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> $chkMetaValue = get_user_meta($userID,"friends");
> >>>>>>>>> if ( ! is_array($chkMetaValue) )
> >>>>>>>>> $chkMetaValue = array();
> >>>>>>>>> $chkMetaValue[] = $profileID;
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> // activity_tracker($current_user, 'added_friend', 'prof');
> >>>>>>>>> update_user_meta( $userID, 'friends', $chkMetaValue );
> >>>>>>>>> $response = array( 'success' => true );
> >>>>>>>>> wp_send_json_success($response);
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> die();
> >>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> function friend_status($author_id) {
> >>>>>>>>> global $wpdb, $current_user;
> >>>>>>>>> get_currentuserinfo();
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> //authorID is the userID of the profile owner
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> $active_user = $current_user->ID;
> >>>>>>>>> $active_user_friends = get_user_meta($active_user, 'friends');
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> if (in_array($author_id, $active_user_friends, true)) {
> >>>>>>>>> $friend_status = "<button id='remove_friend'>Remove
> >> Friend</button>";
> >>>>>>>>> } else {
> >>>>>>>>> $friend_status = "<button id='add_friend'>Add Friend</button>";
> >>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> return $friend_status;
> >>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> That is basically the code I am using to insert the users id into
> >>>> their
> >>>>>>>>> user_meta table.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:08 PM, J.D. Grimes <
> jdg at codesymphony.co>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> There are two ways to use the *_meta functions. The way it looks
> >>>> like
> >>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>>> are doing it is that each user has a single entry in the
> usermeta
> >>>>>> table,
> >>>>>>>>>> with the key ‘friends’. The value for this meta key will be
> stored
> >>>> in
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> database as a serialized array, and when it is pulled out (by
> >>>>>>>>>> get_user_meta()) it gets unserialized into a PHP array.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Alternative is this: Each user has multiple ‘friend’ meta key
> rows
> >>>> in
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> usermeta table, each one’s meta_value the ID of a single user
> that
> >>>> the
> >>>>>>>> user
> >>>>>>>>>> has friended.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The benefit of the second option is that the values may be
> easier
> >> to
> >>>>>>>>>> search. Much easier. But that may not be important to you right
> >> now.
> >>>>>>>> (But
> >>>>>>>>>> then that could change later…) What if you want to show a list
> of
> >>>>>> users
> >>>>>>>> who
> >>>>>>>>>> have friended a user? You will be able to do that easily with
> >> this.
> >>>>>> With
> >>>>>>>>>> the first option, it is possible, but more complex and probably
> >>>> harder
> >>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>> the DB.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The downside is that there are many more rows in usermeta table.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> So each of these functions let you target a single row (as in
> >> first
> >>>>>>>> case)
> >>>>>>>>>> or all rows with a key (as in the later case). Whichever way you
> >> go,
> >>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>>> just need to be consistent through all of the code, obviously.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> -J.D.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Oct 31, 2013, at 3:30 PM, Gregory Lancaster <
> >>>>>>>> greglancaster71 at gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> What would be the benefit of storing the friends in separate
> >> rows?
> >>>> I
> >>>>>>>> did
> >>>>>>>>>>> not know that was an option, but don't see any clear advantages
> >>>>>> either.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Also, I did just search the codex but dont see anything about
> >>>> unique
> >>>>>>>>>> rows.
> >>>>>>>>>>> (I checked get_user_meta, delete_user_meta, update_user_meta. )
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:24 PM, J.D. Grimes <
> >> jdg at codesymphony.co
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, when you call get_user_meta() you need to set the third
> >>>>>> parameter
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ($single) to true:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> $active_user_friends = get_user_meta( $active_user, ‘friends’,
> >>>> true
> >>>>>> );
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Otherwise it will return a nested array. Also, just FYI,
> >>>>>> alternatively
> >>>>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>>>>> could leave the get_user_meta() call the way it is, and change
> >> it
> >>>> so
> >>>>>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>>>>> each friend is stored in a separate meta row (but with the
> same
> >>>> meta
> >>>>>>>>>> key -
> >>>>>>>>>>>> have a look at the *_user_meta functions on the codex).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> -J.D.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 31, 2013, at 3:14 PM, Gregory Lancaster <
> >>>>>>>>>> greglancaster71 at gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought so. One more question if you dont mind helping;
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the function I wrote to determine what button to show
> >> on
> >>>>>> page
> >>>>>>>>>>>> load.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> But regardless if someone has been friended or not, it shows
> >> the
> >>>>>> add
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> friend option. Is something wrong with this?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> function friend_status($author_id) {
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> global $wpdb, $current_user;
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> get_currentuserinfo();
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> //authorID is the userID of the profile owner
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> $active_user = $current_user->ID;
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> $active_user_friends = get_user_meta($active_user,
> 'friends');
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> if (in_array($author_id, $active_user_friends)) {
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> $friend_status = "<button id='remove_friend'>Remove
> >>>>>> Friend</button>";
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> } else {
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> $friend_status = "<button id='add_friend'>Add
> Friend</button>";
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> return $friend_status;
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Then on page: echo $friend_status;
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:53 AM, J.D. Grimes <
> >>>> jdg at codesymphony.co
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I would write a separate function for removal, and hook
> >> it
> >>>>>> to a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> different AJAX action for removal.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 31, 2013, at 2:48 PM, Gregory Lancaster <
> >>>>>>>>>>>> greglancaster71 at gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That works easier :) Once someone is friended I have it
> set
> >> so
> >>>>>> an
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> unfriend
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> button replaces the add friend button via ajax. Is it
> >>>> necessary
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>> write
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> another function for deleting a person? Not sure exactly
> how
> >>>> to
> >>>>>>>> make
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new button function since the data being sent is not
> attached
> >>>> to
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> button
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in any way. maybe I could add a value to the button that
> >> says
> >>>>>>>> remove
> >>>>>>>>>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> add, which would be passed to the function and determine
> what
> >>>>>>>> action
> >>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:32 AM, J.D. Grimes <
> >>>>>> jdg at codesymphony.co
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would do this:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $profileID = $_POST['profileID'];
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $chkMetaValue = get_user_meta($userID,"friends");
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if ( ! is_array($chkMetaValue) )
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $chkMetaValue = array();
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $chkMetaValue[] = $profileID; // or use array_push()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update_user_meta( $userID, 'friends', $chkMetaValue );
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -J.D.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 31, 2013, at 1:32 PM, BenderisGreat <
> >>>>>>>>>> greglancaster71 at gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am not sure exactly how this would work because I start
> >>>> with
> >>>>>> an
> >>>>>>>>>>>> empty
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meta_value field. I dont think I can use array_push if
> >> there
> >>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>> not
> >>>>>>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least one value in the field, correct?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So maybe something like this:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $profileID = $_POST['profileID'];
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $chkMetaValue = get_user_meta($userID,"friends");
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if (!empty($chkMetaValue))
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> {
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> array_push($profileID);
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> } else {
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $profileID;
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update_user_meta( $userID, 'friends', $chkMetaValue );
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is that right?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> View this message in context:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> http://wordpress-hackers.1065353.n5.nabble.com/array-push-on-update-user-meta-tp42688.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from the Wordpress Hackers mailing list archive at
> >>>>>>>> Nabble.com.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
> >>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
> >>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>>>>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
> >>>>>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>>>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
> >>>>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
> >>>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
> >>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
> >>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> wp-hackers mailing list
> >>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >>>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> wp-hackers mailing list
> >>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> >>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> wp-hackers mailing list
> >> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> >> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > wp-hackers mailing list
> > wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>
> _______________________________________________
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>
More information about the wp-hackers
mailing list