[wp-hackers] php -v

Matt Sowden m.sowden at mi-telemetry.com
Thu Nov 7 17:08:12 UTC 2013


I don't think it hurts in any way to stay on 5.2 right now honestly, seeing as if you want to upgrade to 5.3 it can be done with no issue, as stated earlier. It'll cause more problems than it will solve, if it even solves any.

Minimum != Required

Best,
Matthew C. Sowden
+MattSowden
@mattsowden

-----Original Message-----
From: wp-hackers [mailto:wp-hackers-bounces at lists.automattic.com] On Behalf Of J.D. Grimes
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 12:05 PM
To: wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
Subject: Re: [wp-hackers] php -v

I’ve often thought that the lead devs should just announce that support for 5.2 will be dropped by a certain date, and see what happens.

On Nov 7, 2013, at 11:53 AM, Justas Butkus <jbutkus at time.ly> wrote:

> 2013.11.07 18:45, Coen Jacobs rašė:
>> If you compare those two graphs it might look outdated, it is actually not.
>> The difference between the two graphs is that the one on 
>> wordpress.org is the PHP version on servers running WordPress. The 
>> one you linked to is the web in general.
> Is it possible that significant number of sites running PHP 5.2 are on just a few big hosting providers, who run PHP 5.2 allegedly for compatibility reasons, and receiving request from their customers would update to more up-to date versions of PHP, which would allow for them to save resources (i.e. do to more effective caching in PHP 5.5) and/or allow greater developments of the web in general?
> 
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Justas Butkus
> _______________________________________________
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers

_______________________________________________
wp-hackers mailing list
wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers


More information about the wp-hackers mailing list