[wp-hackers] Fixing some SSL cases for 3.4
pauli.price at gmail.com
Thu Nov 3 20:46:44 UTC 2011
Here¹s a transcript from #wordpress-dev. Seeking guidance on how to move
forward with this. It¹s clear that we don¹t have a consensus yet.
Discussion happens here, on the wp-hackers? Or on a trac ticket?
Is it appropriate to consolidate these tickets? If so how?
======== transcript follows ==========
I'd like to help resolve these related tickets for 3.4 - anybody working
on them? #13941, #15928, #18017, #19023, #18005
http://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/13941 Future Release,
micropat->ryan, new, WP_CONTENT_URL should use site_url() to support HTTPS /
http://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/15928 Future Release, atetlaw->(no
owner), assigned, wp_get_attachment_url does not check for HTTPS
http://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/18017 minor, Future Release,
jkudish->jkudish, new, set_url_scheme() function
http://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/19023 high, Awaiting Review,
joostdevalk->nacin, reviewing, Images in Edit Comments break SSL
http://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/18005 minor, Awaiting Review,
rfc1437->(no owner), reopened, mixed http/https installation and
add_custom_background / body_class
That's one chunk of tickets.
Yeah, I'd definitely like to tackle all of that for 3.4.
but all the same underlying problem
Fixing those SSL cases and using home_url() everywhere it is needed would
be nice for 3.4.
And, dare I say it, introduce 'relative' as a scheme argument.
relative -- isn't that a 'live-wire' topic?
as in 'untouchable'
I'd like to do protocol-independent, at least.
(nacin is now known as nacin|afk.)
It'd just be an arg for use by plugin and theme authors. No core movement
to it. Anyhow, just something we might want to discuss.
I like the idea of being able to do relative links when it makes sense
where's the "+1 million" button?
what do you mean I don't get a million votes?
======== transcript ends ==========
Pauli (aka: marfarma)
More information about the wp-hackers