[wp-hackers] Need testers for verbose_page_rules

Johan Eenfeldt johan.eenfeldt at gmail.com
Thu Jul 14 11:16:46 UTC 2011

Very nice, good work!

I've tested with data from two real sites using verbose rules, and the
improvements are huge.

On the worst site url lookup is 30 times faster and rewrite rules
flush is 2000 (!) times faster compared to unmodified WP 3.2.1.

Full numbers in trac.

/ Johan

On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:
> I just put a patch on http://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/16687
> yesterday that should make verbose page rules less painful. However,
> testing the patch is tricky, as I lack a site with a lot of pages and
> which wants to use the %postname% or %category%/%postname% rule.
> If anybody has such a site and knows how to performance test and such,
> it would be handy if you could work with this patch* and see how it
> improves things. I think there's still room for improvement by
> modifying it to not use get_page_by_path and instead to create a new
> function which both get_page_by_path and this code would use to check
> if a page exists, sort of thing. But to know if it helps, I'd need
> before and after type numbers of some sort.
> -Otto
> *http://core.trac.wordpress.org/attachment/ticket/16687/no_verbose_ver1.diff
> _______________________________________________
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers

More information about the wp-hackers mailing list