[wp-hackers] Putting the P in WordPress

[Mitch Canter]

Agreed - this discussion got me out of lurking the list and actually
contributing.  It's good to have great philosophical debate as long as
all sides keep it civil, refrain from snide remarks, and can agree to
disagree.

Mitch Canter
http://www.mitchcanter.com
http://www.studionashvegas.com

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:26 AM, Gavin Pearce <Gavin.Pearce at 3seven9.com> wrote:
> I'd just like to say....
>
> In spite of what everyone, including Matt, has said, I think this is the
> best discussion we've had on here for ages.
>
> Debates and points from both sides - with evidence and some big
> conclusions.
>
> Shame one side is wrong mind ... but still  ;)  (I jest).
>
> G
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wp-hackers-bounces at lists.automattic.com
> [mailto:wp-hackers-bounces at lists.automattic.com] On Behalf Of Peter
> Westwood
> Sent: 07 July 2010 18:27
> To: wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> Subject: Re: [wp-hackers] Fwd: Re: Putting the P in WordPress
>
>
> On 7 Jul 2010, at 16:05, Mark E wrote:
>
>> The obfuscation of the easter egg blatantly violates GPL v2. So all
> the
>> stuff you say about GPL boils down to this: "Do as I as say, not as I
>> do". And here I was thinking that you followed GPL to the letter, as
> you imply other people should do.
>
>
> In what way?
>
> I believe the specific wording from the GPL2 you are interpreting is:
>
> "The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for
> making modifications to it. For an executable work, complete source code
> means all the source code for all modules it contains, plus any
> associated interface definition files, plus the scripts used to control
> compilation and installation of the executable. However, as a special
> exception, the source code distributed need not include anything that is
> normally distributed (in either source or binary form) with the major
> components (compiler, kernel, and so on) of the operating system on
> which the executable runs, unless that component itself accompanies the
> executable. "
>
> In my reading in no way does this preclude the distribution of
> obfuscated code - what it is trying to prevent is the distribution of
> compiled object files without the corresponding source code to allow
> modifications to be made.
>
> As JS and PHP are always distributed in source form as part of the
> WordPress download I don't see how we are violating the licence.
>
> Would you consider it a licence violation if we were to ship WordPress
> without the include .dev.js files so as to decrease the download size
> and make automatic upgrades use less memory?
>
> Cheers
> --
> Peter Westwood
> http://blog.ftwr.co.uk | http://westi.wordpress.com
> C53C F8FC 8796 8508 88D6 C950 54F4 5DCD A834 01C5
>
> _______________________________________________
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> _______________________________________________
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>



-- 
Mitch Canter
studionashvegas
http://www.studionashvegas.com
615-512-2838

Find me on Twitter! http://www.studionashvegas.com

I only check email 2-3 times a day, but if you don't hear back in
24hr, let me know.  Thanks!