[wp-hackers] Relative vs. Absolute URLs stored in db

[Ankur Oberoi]

my apologies, im sort of a n00b with mailing lists (aren't these considered
antiques yet?) so i didnt see that the thread continued further, the first
part in the archives made no mention of URLs just database syncing.

i now see both sides of the argument, and i would prefer the relative URLs
still to be honest - the argument still stands that it is more versatile
that way and not just for dev needs. but i see how this is something that
will probably not be changed anytime soon. the crash course in release
management with hosts file modifications was useful and i will try to follow
that method.

On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Chris Williams <chris at clwill.com> wrote:

> Really?  The entire thread devolved into an argument about the relative
> merits of absolute vs. relative.  Please save us all the pain and go re-read
> the whole thing.
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Ankur Oberoi <aoberoi at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [wp-hackers] Relative vs. Absolute URLs stored in db
>
> doesn't seem like anyone addressed the specific issue of absolute URLs in
> that thread (unless i'm missing something).
> _______________________________________________
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>