[wp-hackers] Caching in 2.5: anyone has a file-based caching plugin?

Joost de Valk joost at joostdevalk.nl
Sat Mar 22 21:44:56 GMT 2008


Almost everything's faster than no caching with WordPress, especially  
with the "default" themes that do like 30 something queries in  
header.php alone...

Cheers,
Joost



--
Joost de Valk
http://www.joostdevalk.nl/

P.S. Join my WordPress Plugin & SEO mailing list, and I'll teach you  
all I know! Just go to:

http://www.joostdevalk.nl/mailing-list/
...to get weekly WordPress Plugin news, SEO tips for your blog and more!

On Mar 22, 2008, at 10:43 PM, Viper007Bond wrote:

> Isn't file based caching not that much faster than no caching?
>
> Although personally I just use nothing on my personal blog and
> WP-Super-Cache on my high traffic site.
>
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Stephane Daury <wordpress at tekartist.org 
> >
> wrote:
>
>>
>> <http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/wordpress-25-and-the-object-cache/>
>>
>> Since fs based caching has been removed from 2.5, has anyone come up
>> w/ a plugin alternative or are ppl w/ restrictive shared host left
>> behind?
>>
>> Could also be useful for local dev, so we don;t need apc, memcache,
>> etc to write and test caching in our plugins.
>>
>> I do run memcache locally anyway for other dev, so I'll be okay, but
>> not everybody does.
>>
>> Any insight?
>>
>> ---
>> Stephane Daury - http://tekartist.org/
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wp-hackers mailing list
>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Viper007Bond | http://www.viper007bond.com/ | http:// 
> www.finalgear.com/
> _______________________________________________
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers



More information about the wp-hackers mailing list