[wp-hackers] Settings Page-only Shortcodes

[Viper007Bond]

Why is it wasteful? And what alternative is there other than pointing them
all at the same function?

On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Matt <speedboxer at gmail.com> wrote:

> Right, thanks.
>
> I have another question though. What would be the best way of
> processing a lot of shortcodes? Making a function for each seems
> wasteful (these shortcodes don't have any attributes and are all
> self-closing).
>
> On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Viper007Bond <viper at viper007bond.com>
> wrote:
> > No as they were designed for posts.
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Matt <speedboxer at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Viper007Bond <viper at viper007bond.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Then just register them conditionally.
> >>
> >> Alright, thought there might be some built-in functionality to do it.
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Matt (http://mattsblog.ca/)
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> wp-hackers mailing list
> >> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> >> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Viper007Bond | http://www.viper007bond.com/ | http://www.finalgear.com/
> > _______________________________________________
> > wp-hackers mailing list
> > wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matt (http://mattsblog.ca/)
> _______________________________________________
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>



-- 
Viper007Bond | http://www.viper007bond.com/ | http://www.finalgear.com/