[wp-hackers] GPL/WP-compatible icon sets?
Otto
otto at ottodestruct.com
Tue Apr 15 14:12:30 GMT 2008
No, mere "aggregation" doesn't mix licenses. These icons are separate
files in the theme. It's one thing when icons are compiled into object
code and included with a program, it's wholly another when the files
are entirely separate, even if they're in the same ZIP file.
If you put the icons in a separate directory of the theme, and stick a
readme in there with the CC licensing, then you're probably good. The
GPL doesn't, and cannot, expand to cover artwork when there's a clear
layer of separation. It's referencing the artwork, not including it.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Doug Stewart <zamoose at gmail.com> wrote:
> Howdy all,
> I've been plunking along on a theme and have been using the very nice
> Mini Icons 2 (available here:
> http://www.brandspankingnew.net/archive/2006/12/hohoho.html) and I am
> just about ready to release the theme. However, I noted last night
> that the MI2 icons are licensed under Creative Commons
> Attribution-Share Alike 2.5. If I read the FSF/Gnu take correctly,
> CC-anything is not GPL-compatible, thus I'm not really sure if I can
> include them with my (intended-to-be) GPLv2'd theme.
>
> I've not licensed my work yet, so perhaps there is another
> WP-compatible license that I could ship the theme under to skirt
> this..?
>
> Thoughts? Suggestions? Pointers to excellent GPL/LGPL-compat icons?
>
> --
> -Doug
>
> http://literalbarrage.org/blog/
> _______________________________________________
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>
More information about the wp-hackers
mailing list