computerguru at neosmart.net
Tue Sep 18 20:26:50 GMT 2007
Just my two cents:
I think it is pretty illogical to not do something just because it "might
not be as effective" as other things that aren't mutually exclusive.
Hell, if it's just a 1% difference w/ minification + gz compression +
bundling vs just gz compression... That's 1% TIMES xx MILLIONS of requests
to your blog === LOTS of bandwdith saved!
And in this case, it's more than that, seemingly a lot more. But even if it
isn't, I don't think that's a good excuse.
On 9/18/07, Charles <lists07 at wiltgen.net> wrote:
> >> server-side text compression and (3) file-combining is the norm,
> >> more serious than roll-overs.
> > 1 and 3 are useless in most (not all, mind you) cases.
> I'm not sure how you arrived at that conclusion.
> Check out this chart to understand how server-side text compression and
> Combining files when possible is almost always a good idea for deployed
> apps, since (1) HTTP requests are relatively expensive and (2) browsers
> typically limit themselves to two parallel downloads per hostname.
> -- Charles
> introducing new bugs during the minification process "compressors". Not
> everyone makes the distinction.
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
More information about the wp-hackers