[wp-hackers] XCache Variable Storage vs. WP Object Cache

[Viper007Bond]

Probably.

On 9/16/07, Computer Guru <computerguru at neosmart.net> wrote:
>
> Is this supposed to be on in the wp-config.php
>
> define(ENABLE_CACHE, true);
>
> when using a custom object-cache.php?
>
>
> On 9/16/07, Computer Guru <computerguru at neosmart.net> wrote:
> >
> > OK, this is what I'm doing currently looks like:
> >
> > set_data:
> > check if is_object() or is_callable()
> > if true, serialize.
> > check if is_resource      (resource is the only thing that is not safe
> > to serialize... )
> > if true, don't cache
> > else store it as-is
> >
> > get_data:
> > check if data is_serialized_object()         (custom function)
> > if true, unserialize and return
> > else just return
> >
> >
> > While I don't get a PHP access violation right away like I used to
> > (before anything even loads), I still get an access violation mid-way
> > through the page load.
> >
> >
> > Anything else I can/should try?
> >
> > On 9/16/07, DD32 <wordpress at dd32.id.au> wrote:
> > > On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 19:31:09 +1000, Computer Guru <
> > computerguru at neosmart.net> wrote:
> > > > Only thing I can think of is this warning on the XCache site:
> > > > Warning : At the moment, It is not possible to store resources,
> > > > callbacks or objects using xcache_* functions.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Does WP Object Cache attempt to cache any of these? If so, is there
> > > > any way of stopping it from doing so?
> > >
> > > Theres quite a few Objects being stored in the Object Cache :)
> > > I dont think any Resources are attempted for caching, and i'd be
> unsure
> > about callbacks.
> > >
> > > using serialize() should convert everything into a string for storing
> > though.
> > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > On 9/16/07, Stephane Daury <wordpress at tekartist.org> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> /me loooove memcache
> > > >>
> > > >> But I wish php/memcache would allow for:
> > > >> - regex for keymapping
> > > >> - tag keys like done in the Zend Framework
> > > >>
> > > >> Stephane
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sep 16, 2007, at 3:32, Tom Barta wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> >> But it is almost always going to be faster to use a memory-based
> > > >> >> object storage engine than the built-in file-based method, as
> > > >> >> retrieving data from memory is orders of magnitude faster than
> > > >> >> retrieving data from a hard disk.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I don't have any hard numbers at the moment, but I was playing
> with
> > > >> > memcache at one point and discovered something surprising (and
> > > >> > disheartening about PHP);  Caching arbitrary objects with
> memcache
> > > >> > (within a single request) was faster than using a PHP associative
> > > >> > array as a cache!  Memcache is wicked fast.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --
> > > >> > Tom
> > > >> > _______________________________________________
> > > >> > wp-hackers mailing list
> > > >> > wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> > > >> > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> > > >>
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> wp-hackers mailing list
> > > >> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> > > >> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > wp-hackers mailing list
> > > wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> > > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Computer Guru
> > Director,
> > NeoSmart Technologies
> > http://neosmart.net/blog/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Computer Guru
> Director,
> NeoSmart Technologies
> http://neosmart.net/blog/
> _______________________________________________
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>



-- 
Viper007Bond | http://www.viper007bond.com/