[wp-hackers] 2.4 Feature Proposal: New general meta-data table
otto at ottodestruct.com
Fri Oct 12 00:48:10 GMT 2007
I'm really not paying attention today. It does do an insert via
db_insert. So I was right the first time, the update alone should be
On 10/11/07, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:
> Oh, well, yeah, okay we do need something that does an insert. It
> would be nice if the update and insert were the same function call
> On 10/11/07, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:
> > On 10/11/07, wordpress at santosj.name <wordpress at santosj.name> wrote:
> > > Also, there seems to be a missing insert_general_meta(); the code in
> > > update_general_meta() will return false if there is no $object_id.
> > Shouldn't need an insert, as having no $object_id is not an option.
> > Every entry must have an object_id. For the cases where it replaces
> > wp_options (let's call that object_type = 'blogmeta'), the $object_id
> > = some unique identifier to the blog (consider the MU version here
> > too, each blog can have a different object_id).
> > -Otto
More information about the wp-hackers