[wp-hackers] WordPress 3
computerguru at neosmart.net
Sun May 20 15:28:01 GMT 2007
Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> Captain's log. We received a signal from Computer Guru on StarDate
> 19/05/07 11:41. Translated to English it stated:
>> That's nonsense, Matt.
>> I'd venture a guess and say that WordPress is "bigger and more well
>> known" than Gentoo & co. - and WordPress definitely releases more often.
>> While I agree that WP shouldn't be year-versioned, I disagree with your
>> reasons. I don't hear of OpenOffice 2008 nor Firefox 2002.
> How about WordPress 7.05? ;-)
> Version /numbers/ can contain valuable (and compressed) information.
> Codenames assist indexing and identification of information. They are
> also more memorable and make communication easier. But WordPress has
> had these for many years... just a shame people prefer to name WP
> versions by the numbers.
You mean the Jazz names? Ella, et. al?
I think no one even knows them. Look at Ubuntu - they don't ever
publicly call Feisty Fawn "Ubuntu 7.04," so that's what the customers
If WordPress 2.2 headlines said: "WordPress Zippy Zebra Released" that's
what people would call it. But they read the headlines, it says:
"WordPress 2.2 Released!"
something something lorem epsum something something
BTW, WordPress 2.2 is codename "Zippy Zebra"
Go download WordPress 2.2
No wonder people call it WordPress 2.2 or WP22 for short :P
(And, yes, I do use DVORAK.. See how beautiful all those clustered
vowels look? :P)
(And WTF is wrong with GnuPG? "Problem with Agent" even when I try it
without --use-agent.... Maybe I'll start using Ciphire instead.. or go
back to Windows[!] - so excuse this unsigned message.)
More information about the wp-hackers