[wp-hackers] port of 2.1 to postgresql

Dave Cramer davec at postgresintl.com
Fri Mar 16 11:06:59 GMT 2007

Interesting. I've never heard this argument before. Almost everyone  
wants flexibility.

On 16-Mar-07, at 1:05 AM, Charles Hooper wrote:

> -1 for supporting multiple DBMSs. Alot of queries would have to be  
> re-written to be strictly ANSI SQL compliant, which pretty much  
> defeats the whole purpose of using one DBMS over another. I say we  
> keep it strictly MySQL in order to take full advantage of MySQL's  
> features.
> Martin Sturm wrote:
>> Why doesn't Wordpress support multiple databases? I understand  
>> that it
>> requires some changes to the archtecture, but it is a very useful
>> feature I think.
> _______________________________________________
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers

More information about the wp-hackers mailing list