[wp-hackers] Updating Codex to newer MediaWiki version
otto at ottodestruct.com
Wed Dec 12 17:52:21 GMT 2007
Why would you update the version because your major revision went up
past "9"? That makes absolutely no sense.
Also, unusual how? Virtually every open source project in existence
uses that numbering scheme. Including WordPress. Note the existence of
versions 2.0.10 and 2.0.11:
Don't think of the period as a decimal point, because it's not. It's
just a separator. Write it as version 2-9 if you like. Then 2-10 might
not bother you as much.
On 12/12/07, Alex Hempton-Smith <hempsworth at googlemail.com> wrote:
> The 2.10 format seems pretty unusual nowadays from what I've seen.
> Would it be 3.0?
> On Dec 12, 2007 5:13 PM, Rob <r at robm.me.uk> wrote:
> > What would the next release after 2.9 be if not 2.10?
> > --
> > Rob Miller
> > http://robm.me.uk/
> > _______________________________________________
> > wp-hackers mailing list
> > wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
More information about the wp-hackers