[wp-hackers] XMLRPC and the patch
Peter Westwood
peter.westwood at ftwr.co.uk
Fri Oct 13 21:30:47 GMT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jens Strobel wrote:
> Hi.
> I am wondering why the Patch which is attached on
> #1008<http://trac.wordpress.org/ticket/1008>isn't merged to the
> public. Is there any reason for that?
> When i am searching for the bug in my application i read the api-doc of the
> MetaWeblog-API:
> http://www.xmlrpc.com/metaWeblogApi#metaweblognewmediaobject
> and there the following written: "bits is a base64-encoded binary value
> containing the content of the object.", so i think the patch is doing the
> absolute right thing:
> decode the base64-encoded string.
> There is a second ticket #679 <http://trac.wordpress.org/ticket/679> which
> is closed with WORKSFORME.
>
> It would be nice, if someone could tell me the reason, so i can understand.
I would expect the main reason why this patch has lingered is the
majority of the developers who hang around trac and this list don't use
xml-rpc to post and don't have the easy ability to test the patch and
check that is it doing the correct thing.
Can you suggest a free client that we can use to test the patch that
uses this API? Or even better a number of clients we can test?
westi
- --
Peter Westwood
http://blog.ftwr.co.uk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFMAWHVPRdzag0AcURAn6jAJ9UgjsjpYgwM3ffCdhvwkPk//NnpgCdF3cE
XTZv5IQ+0ouoqIPpiP3VYXE=
=2uzn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the wp-hackers
mailing list