[wp-hackers] Atom 1.0
mathibus at gmail.com
Sun Sep 11 09:01:51 GMT 2005
I'm not sure what you mean, Pete, but anyway the feed validates as
Atom 1.0 so I don't think there's a problem. I didn't make any of
those changes though... ??? Please check the source code
<http://mathibus.com/examples/wp-atom> and see if it's okay.
On 06/09/05, Pete Prodoehl <pete.prodoehl at cygnusinteractive.com> wrote:
> Mathias Bynens wrote:
> > IMHO Atom 1.0 is a must-do upgrade.
> > See <http://mathibus.com/examples/wp-atom> (add the .phps extension if
> > necessary; I'm using MultiViews but IE doesn't quite seem to handle
> > those very well) for my cleaned-up version of wp-atom.php, which
> > (besides the cleaning up part) also adds support for categories with
> > HTML in their title. I deem this to be the most perfect wp-atom.php
> > out there for use on any WordPress install. Suggestions? Do let me
> > know.
> Does it handle enclosures properly?
> I had to hack at feed-functions.php and create an atom_enclosure
> function as the rss_enclosure function that was being used for
> wp-atom.php was fine for RSS but all wrong for Atom.
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
More information about the wp-hackers