[wp-hackers] Re: 1.5.2 or on to 1.6?
Peter Westwood
peter.westwood at ftwr.co.uk
Mon May 23 08:26:04 GMT 2005
/me trys again after gpg ate the previous email!.
On Mon, May 23, 2005 6:52 am, Martin Geisler said:
> Matthew Mullenweg <m at mullenweg.com> writes:
>
>> As much more core code will be touched it's likely that
>> compatibility with some things will be broken and there will need to
>> be a long testing period.
>
> I've only been using WordPress since February, but what has struck me
> as the biggest problem is the coding standard used. I've written a
> longer piece[1] about it on my blog, but to summerize:
>
> * Global variables are used all over the place, making it difficult to
> track the dependencies between various parts of the code.
>
> * There are no comments in vast parts of the core code. To understand
> the core functions one has to read the body of the functions, which
> is really bad, IMHO. Doccomments which specify argument and return
> types would be a very good move.
>
Would a set of patches that added documentation in a format such as phpDocumentor [1] be welcome?
If so I'm quite willing to sit down and work on them as a way of giving back to the community
[1] - http://www.phpdoc.org/
westi
--
Peter Westwood
Blog: http://www.ftwr.co.uk/blog/
Get Firefox: http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&id=20287
More information about the wp-hackers
mailing list