[wp-hackers] Mailman-style Blog Archiving
Matthew Mullenweg
m at mullenweg.com
Mon May 2 14:58:22 GMT 2005
Scott Merrill wrote:
> Some complaints I have:
> * Blog discussions have a flat hierarchy: everything is in response to
> one top-level post.
> * Blog comment permalinks are inseperable from their parent post.
> * pingbacks and trackbacks are (IMHO) inelegant means for participation
> in a conversation.
The are all things I'd hope we could address before implementing this. :)
> But careful consideration helped me realize what specifically it was
> about a mailing list that I found so valuable: archives.
Bingo! And think if people could do the same sort of search you do
without having to have been subscribed to the list forever.
> for post-only and comment-only permalinks respectively; and an overview
> could be made similar to the display at:
> http://comox.textdrive.com/pipermail/wp-hackers/2005-May/thread.html
I think it would be even more useful if it could show the current post
as well as the context on one page, instead of having to go back and forth.
> pingbacks. In order to provide a coherent view of the conversation in
> one archive display, full-post *backs would be necessary. If an
I agree full caching would be necessary, also because we don't want the
discussion to fragment if someone's blog goes down.
--
Matt Mullenweg
http://photomatt.net | http://wordpress.org
http://pingomatic.com | http://cnet.com
More information about the wp-hackers
mailing list