[wordpress] Re: [wp-hackers] Forum post: Huge server hits

[Elliott Bäck]

I thought of it, but it's too much work for tonight.  You'd need to keep 
the gzipped and the non-gzipped around anyway....

Thanks,
Elliott C. Bäck

607-229-0623
http://elliottback.com



Robert Deaton wrote:

>A better idea, why not cache the gzipped pages also? Lessens server
>load AND bandwidth.
>
>On 7/12/05, Elliott Bäck <ecb29 at cornell.edu> wrote:
>  
>
>>Done!
>>
>>http://dev.wp-plugins.org/ticket/215
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Elliott C. Bäck
>>
>>607-229-0623
>>http://elliottback.com
>>
>>
>>
>>Mark Jaquith wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Elliott Bäck wrote:
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>It bugged me that WP-cache doesn't detect and send gzip'ed files, but
>>>>I suppose it's purpose is to be fast, not bandwidth-savvy.  I've
>>>>hacked mine up to send gzip....
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>No reason that it can't be both!  I don't think gzip takes much
>>>overhead... at least not from what I've heard.  Care to submit those
>>>changes as a ticket so that all may benefit?
>>>http://dev.wp-plugins.org/newticket?component=wp-cache
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>wp-hackers mailing list
>>>wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>>>http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>wp-hackers mailing list
>>wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>>http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>