[wp-forums] WP attacks sticky?

[esmi at quirm dot net]

on 12/04/2013 20:29 Mark Ratledge said the following:
> Looks good; maybe add how to whitelist a wider range or block, i.e.
> 192.168.1.* or 192.168.0.0/16 ? I have had to do that with some
> clients on not-static IPs but stay's within the ISP's range. Or would
> that be too confusing to some? I know the /16 is a calculation
> depending on the actual IP

Oh - good point! I've added basic details for using something like 
192.168.1.*

Anyone have any comments on using something like 192.168.0.0/16?

Mel
-- 
http://quirm.net
http://blackwidows.co.uk