[wp-forums] Titles/Promotions/Labels
Podz
podz at tamba2.org.uk
Mon Jul 11 11:24:28 GMT 2005
Scott Merrill wrote:
> Again, my preference is that the default "Member" title be removed. I
> think it's silly to list "member" status on a forum that does not permit
> anonymous posting.
>
> Then, users who satisfy whatever criteria is established can get
> whatever title(s) we decided upon.
This would be a core decision though, and if people didn't have 'Member'
there, what would they have ? It's a link to their profile too.
> Not everyone is a volunteer. The person who asks questions without
> contributing back is not volunteering. Only those who take the time to
> help answer questions are volunteers.
>
True and for this reason alone, plugin developers get zero special
treatment. Plugin development, a presence on #wordpress and even
submitting patches are all good things, but a forum presence is
something else.
>
> Although it will be nearly impossible to articulate successfully, I
> would very much like to also require some measure of "decorum": it's
> insufficient to just give the right answer. One must be demonstrably
> supportive (within measure) when providing answers, instead of just
> spitting out correct facts without context.
> (Yes, I've changed my mind a bit on the practice of merely dropping
> links to the Codex; thanks largely to this list.)
I agree (even though I do fail here sometimes)
> Should we tier the title structure, to make it clear what a person's
> effort / expertise / contributions are?
> * Support Volunteer
> * Documentor
> * Jack-of-all-trades
>
> Or, should we insist that titles are only assigned to people who
> contribute at least one article to the Codex? I suppose in the long run
> this will be terribly exclusionary, as the Codex gains material; and
> since not everyone will be interested / able to fill in the missing parts.
>
I'd stick with the forums myself, and exclude codex. one does not always
mean the other ?
P.
More information about the wp-forums
mailing list