Ah, forgot about the UI Link category. It's just so easy to miss. <br><br>@Jane, the articles in there are the ones. <br><br>If it's working, we just keep plowing forward, but let's remember to go through and put all of them into that category so we don't boo boo with changes or edits. It's happened but luckily we have the best and most watchful team around!<br>
<br>Thanks,<br><br>Lorelle<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:45 PM, mrmist <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:listswpdocs@mist.org.uk">listswpdocs@mist.org.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On 04/04/2012 22:21, Michael Hancock wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
If I remember correctly, documents are protected mainly to ward off<br>
people defacing articles. See<br>
<a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/Special:ProtectedPages" target="_blank">http://codex.wordpress.org/<u></u>Special:ProtectedPages</a><br>
<br>
Otherwise, I haven’t seen too many situations where documents have been<br>
rendered inadequate from typical edits.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
I agree. I also think that the Codex format doesn't easily lend to such senior editor type moderation. Realistically, this sort of thing is achieved by people undoing or rolling back poor quality edits.<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
mrmist.</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
wp-docs mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:wp-docs@lists.automattic.com" target="_blank">wp-docs@lists.automattic.com</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs" target="_blank">http://lists.automattic.com/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/wp-docs</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>