How are they incompatible? I read the two over briefly, and it didn't seem incompatible, though they easily could be. Could you point me to where you are reading. <div><br></div><div>Also, this is a software licence, not a documentation license. The whole licence doesn't make sense from a documentation point of view. I, for one, am releasing all my contributions under GPL, CC-By-SA, and (will maybe) GFDL (just in case). That includes all past contributions. If all the contributors would do the same, or at least GPL and CC-By-SA, it would help quite a bit.<div>
<br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Arlen<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Andrew Nacin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wp@andrewnacin.com">wp@andrewnacin.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Arlen Beiler <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:arlenbee@gmail.com" target="_blank">arlenbee@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>It is obvious that we have the wrong licence. Is the GFDL compatible with the GNU General Public Licence? It seems it would be.</div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>From what I am reading, GFDL is incompatible with the GPL.</div>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
wp-docs mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:wp-docs@lists.automattic.com">wp-docs@lists.automattic.com</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs" target="_blank">http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>