Actually, for the function reference page, I tended to prefer the bold links. It made a clear difference between functions that had documentation, and functions that did not. Of course, I'm sure our goal is for all of the functions on that page to be links, making this a moot point.<br>
<br>-Steve<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Lorelle VanFossen <<a href="mailto:lorellevan@gmail.com">lorellevan@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
With Jennifer's clean up and my final tweaks, I'd say the matter was decided on how the Functions Reference page should look. Thanks everyone for their input!<br><br>Now, if we could just do violence on whoever decided to make links bold in the Codex, a poor web practice, and clean up the rest of the CSS woes, we'd be in better shape. :D <br>
<font color="#888888">
<br>Lorelle<br>
</font><br>_______________________________________________<br>
wp-docs mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:wp-docs@lists.automattic.com">wp-docs@lists.automattic.com</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs" target="_blank">http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>