[wp-docs] The main page.

[Andrea Rennick]

And those basics are there  http://codex.wordpress.org/Writing_Posts (for
example). I'm not suggesting they not be. (double negative, sorry.)

I think there was a misunderstanding with regards to my pointing our the
WordPress.com docs as an *example*. I had responded to m3shrom here:
http://lists.automattic.com/pipermail/wp-docs/2011-August/002651.html

where he said:

">* Personally, I've struggled in working on docs which are targeted at*

>* people using*>* - their own install*>* - Wordpress.com*>* - a blog on a hosted WordPress network"*

And I was reiterating that the codex should be solely for people managing
their own install. That's it. If they are managing their own network, that
is also covered, but we should not be expected to write docs for people who
have someone else managing their blog.

Does that make sense?

A.

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Spencer Hill <
spencerhill at theportlandco.com> wrote:

> I think I agree with you Andrea. Though, I don't think anyone in this
> conversation is suggesting we provide site-specific support - that's
> obviously not manageable. But it would seem any questions people have to how
> WordPress functions - out of the box - should be included within the codex.
> So questions like "How do I edit a page?", or "How do I add a post?", etc...
> should be included in the codex in my opinion. Or at least some official
> WordPress wiki.
> _______________________________________________
> wp-docs mailing list
> wp-docs at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs
>



-- 
-- 
Andrea Rennick, http://wpebooks.com and http://ronandandrea.com
Co-author of WordPress All-In-One For Dummies http://rml.me/aio
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.automattic.com/pipermail/wp-docs/attachments/20110901/b5d2e15a/attachment-0001.htm>