[wp-docs] Is there any real WP staff here

[Chip Bennett]

If one is adding documentation to the Codex for purposes of self-promotion,
one should probably reconsider those motives.

The purpose of the Codex is to share information and documentation about
WordPress, not to gain self-promotion.

Chip

On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 11:10 AM, ThemeDaily <admin at themedaily.com> wrote:

>
> "管理员" on this page http://cn.wordpress.org/contact/ means "administrator"
> But I didn't find any similar on others like http://tw.
> wordpress.org/about/
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 2:03 AM, ThemeDaily <admin at themedaily.com> wrote:
>
>> *>Can you be specific what what offensive or issue is being had with the
>> person?*
>> There are *no guideline* mention the translator can't left personal
>> information to self-promote and we also can find the same on other language
>> page.
>> As a respect to contributor  I think it should be talked before they
>> remove anything like this--even their actions probably are right.
>>
>> *
>> >Which makes it confusing as to why you think they are administrators.*
>> Jiehanzheng left his/her personal imformation(personal email etc) on page:
>> http://cn.wordpress.org/contact/ before so I thought he/she was an
>> administrator, but it seems only his/her name is remained on this page now.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:39 AM, Lorelle on WordPress <
>> lorelleonwordpress at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I agree that the conversation is a bit hard to follow. Can you be
>>> specific what what offensive or issue is being had with the person? That
>>> would really help us.
>>>
>>> The "supervisor" administrator list is here:
>>> http://codex.wordpress.org/Special:ListUsers/sysop and I don't see their
>>> name on that list. It is a locked down list and probably desperately in need
>>> of updating, too. Which makes it confusing as to why you think they are
>>> administrators.
>>>
>>> Anyone can contribute to the WordPress Codex, and is welcome to do so as
>>> long as they do so within our guidelines.
>>>
>>> Thanks for taking this on as we're having trouble with the direct
>>> translation. It is much appreciated.
>>>
>>> Lorelle
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 8:29 AM, mrmist <listswpdocs at mist.org.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In message <
>>>> AANLkTikyPdcT8-MYvWbKZZ_cBfeq0e-DnwxPqL9K2iuo at mail.gmail.com>,
>>>> ThemeDaily <admin at themedaily.com> writes
>>>>
>>>>  Hello, everyone
>>>>>
>>>>> I noticed below users contribute nothing for Codex,but it seems they
>>>>> think
>>>>> themselves are the top administrators of Codex,
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm struggling to follow the thread of conversation to be honest, what
>>>> with it being in a language I can only read through Google-translate, and in
>>>> a mixed-up order timewise.
>>>>
>>>> However, I can tell you that none of the mentioned people are codex
>>>> admins.
>>>>
>>>> Further, to answer one of the points that was raised by someone at some
>>>> point - a number of the codex admins do subscribe to this list.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> mrmist
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> wp-docs mailing list
>>>> wp-docs at lists.automattic.com
>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> wp-docs mailing list
>>> wp-docs at lists.automattic.com
>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wp-docs mailing list
> wp-docs at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.automattic.com/pipermail/wp-docs/attachments/20110302/52d497c5/attachment.htm>