[wp-docs] WPMU Functions

[Tom Lynch]

This sounds reasonable. I think deleting the page may be easiest.



Kind Regards


Tom Lynch

++++++++++++++++++++++++

T: +44 (0)7786 540 167
E: me at unknowndomain.co.uk

tomlynch.co.uk

++++++++++++++++++++++++

On 18 Oct 2009, at 01:56, Carreg <carreg at carregs-blog.co.uk> wrote:

> Tom Lynch wrote:
>> Well what would you like to do? we could delete it?!
> Do you mean the page, the category or the link?
>
> Cards on the table: I don't like the category much.  I think it's
> superfluous to requirements given we have the page.  However if we
> do keep it then we do need to link from one to the other.  Perhaps
> in that case it would help to change the paragraphs at the top of
> one or other to at least prevent the confusion of it looking like
> it's the same page.
>
> Perhaps we should rename the "WPMU Functions" to "WPMU Function
> Reference" and give it an overhaul to be more like the main function
> reference with a wider scope.  It could then also include links to
> documentation on MU's additional classes as well as the functions.
>
> Other than that I agree with Andrea -- it's looking good!  I notice
> there are a few functions missing from the list still (such as the
> excellent is_user_spammy), so now most of the stuff that was there
> is now documented it's probably worth going through and adding all
> the missing functions and documenting those.  It doesn't seem like
> the function list has been updated for a good while and with that in
> mind it also strikes me that it might be worth adding some version
> information to each function so people aren't looking for things
> which don't exist for their particular install.
>
> C.
> _______________________________________________
> wp-docs mailing list
> wp-docs at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs