[wp-docs] Function Reference a Mess

[Steve]

My vote is for getting rid of the short definitions, as users can find those
out by clicking on the link and reading the first line or two in the
description. Many of the function names are somewhat self-explanatory
anyways.

-Steve

On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Lorelle VanFossen <lorellevan at gmail.com>
wrote:

> http://codex.wordpress.org/Function_Reference/ is a mess.
>
> The Function Reference should match, in look and style, the Template Tags
> page. The Template Tags master directory page is set up with the template
> tags listed under each "category" of use. So the Function Reference page
> started out.
>
> People have now been attempting to add a "definition" of the functions
> into the list and it looks horrible.
>
> If we recreate the list to display functions and definition, it must be
> consistent and available for EVERY function - and then the same technique
> applied to the Template Tags page.
>
> So the question is, do we stick to the format set in the  Template Tags or
> redefine both with function/tag and definitions (a two column layout for
> every section)?
>
> Lorelle
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wp-docs mailing list
> wp-docs at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-docs
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://comox.textdrive.com/pipermail/wp-docs/attachments/20080417/66392875/attachment.htm