[wp-docs] new codex page for developers/dev discussion?

[Michael D.Adams]

James,
Nice work.  The redundancy is good (and gave me a chuckle).  The only 
thing I would worry about is the intimidation factor.  I image it would 
be better for a few non-bugs to get through than to miss any real bugs. 
  Should the article be given an encouraging introduction?

Michael

On Mar 11, 2005, at 11:36 PM, James Huff wrote:

> I hope this will do for now: 
> http://codex.wordpress.org/Submitting_WordPress_Bugs  It's been a long 
> week.  Do you think I was redundant enough about "If your bug has 
> already been resolved there, please do not report it. It has been 
> resolved. It is no longer an issue. If your bug has not been resolved, 
> please continue."?
>
> James Huff (MacManX)
> MacMerc Contributing Editor
> http://www.macmerc.com
> http://www.macmanx.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://comox.textdrive.com/pipermail/wp-docs/attachments/20050312/520c0c22/attachment.bin