[glotpress-updates] [GlotPress] #342: Cleanup to locales.php
GlotPress
noreply at wordpress.org
Tue Jul 8 19:05:55 UTC 2014
#342: Cleanup to locales.php
---------------------------------+-----------------
Reporter: stuwest | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: locale information | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
---------------------------------+-----------------
Comment (by nacin):
First, this is great. I've been neck-deep in both this file and CLDR data
for some time now, and it's good to see outside perspective.
Since there is a lot of formatting churn (whitespace, ordering of
properties, "misc cleanup," etc.), it's extremely tough to see what's
going on. I'm working on a quick script to do actual per-property
comparisons of what changed or was added or removed. In the meantime, some
things I'm noticing so far:
* We need all of the ISO codes as they are the best reference we have for
matching an Accept-Language browser header to a corresponding WP
translation. (I've been working on this problem as recently as this
morning.)
* As Zé has also pointed out, a lot of the native and English names have
history, as in were requested/determined by translators. I'm fine with
trying to move to more accepted representations, particularly in cases
where there was no deliberate decision to deviate from that.
* Fallback is a loaded term. CLDR's approach is highly complicated and it
looks like it is simplified significantly here. See
http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr35/#Locale_Inheritance,
http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr35/#LanguageMatching, etc. We also have a
need to introduce variants, such as sr_Latn and concepts like an
"informal" German translation. See also
http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr35/#Likely_Subtags.
* Aside from the variable syntax issues johnbillion points out, the local
variables ("object names") *are* actually used outside the class. See
https://glotpress.trac.wordpress.org/browser/trunk/locales/locales.php?rev=931#L1260.
I didn't code this, talk to Nikolay. :-)
In general, smaller changes will definitely be easier to review. As in,
tackling all ISO changes in one go, all fallbacks in another pass, all
reordering at once, etc.
Can I ask if there was some kind of impetus for this?
--
Ticket URL: <https://glotpress.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/342#comment:3>
GlotPress <https://glotpress.trac.wordpress.org>
Easy comin', easy goin'
More information about the glotpress-updates
mailing list