[buddypress-trac] [BuddyPress Trac] #7443: Hidden groups CSS specificity

[buddypress-trac]

#7443: Hidden groups CSS specificity
--------------------------+------------------------------
 Reporter:  MikeGillihan  |       Owner:
     Type:  defect (bug)  |      Status:  new
 Priority:  normal        |   Milestone:  Awaiting Review
Component:  Groups        |     Version:  1.7
 Severity:  minor         |  Resolution:
 Keywords:  dev-feedback  |
--------------------------+------------------------------

Comment (by danbp):

 @r-a-y, @hnla

 IMHO, this is only an expectation ''"we'll probably break sites that are
 already using this rule"'' and is at least at the same level as breaking
 sites using the actual default rule (and the reason of this ticket).

 Would you name a class {{{.relative}}} or {{{.width}}} ? Probably not. So
 why would you continue to use {{{.hidden}}} ?

 This shouldn't be a long decision, especially because it exist a CSS
 [http://stackoverflow.com/questions/939909/html-naming-conventions-for-id-
 class-and-to-include-element-type-prefix#23658906/ naming convention].

--
Ticket URL: <https://buddypress.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/7443#comment:3>
BuddyPress Trac <http://buddypress.org/>
BuddyPress Trac