[buddypress-trac] [BuddyPress Trac] #7210: Group type frontend integration

[buddypress-trac]

#7210: Group type frontend integration
-------------------------+--------------------
 Reporter:  r-a-y        |       Owner:
     Type:  enhancement  |      Status:  new
 Priority:  normal       |   Milestone:  2.7
Component:  Groups       |     Version:  2.6.0
 Severity:  normal       |  Resolution:
 Keywords:  has-patch    |
-------------------------+--------------------

Comment (by hnla):

 Replying to [comment:36 r-a-y]:
 > > I don't really care what legacy templates do any longer they are dead
 to me
 >
 > Are you referring to the group type directory message or the group type
 list function?  I don't mind if we make the change to the directory type
 message, although the change is quite trivial.
 >
 > FWIW, `<strong>` vs. `<b>` - https://developer.mozilla.org/en-
 US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/strong#Bold_vs._Strong
 >
 > {{{

 >
 > strong is a logical state, and bold is a physical state.
 >
 > Logical states separate presentation from the content, and by doing so
 allow for it to be
 > expressed in many different ways. Perhaps instead of rendering some text
 as bold you want
 > to render it red, or a different size, or underlined, or whatever.
 >
 > It makes more sense to change the presentational properties of strong
 than it does bold.
 > This is because bold is a physical state; there is no separation of
 presentation and content,
 > and making bold do anything other than bold text would be confusing and
 illogical.
 > }}}
 >
 > `<strong>` sounds like the correct use here, but I could be wrong.


 No matter @r-a-y I'll work out what we need by way of ease of access to
 these elements so we can change as see fit, I'll try and make a note on
 Nouveau tickets about it.

 fwiw I think that Mozilla ref sounds like gibberish tbh I would not say
 ''strong'' is correct nor do I understand what on earth they are on about
 but in html5 they attempted to redefine semantics for all these elements
 so to describe `b` as physical is not strictly correct, I do love Mozilla
 & their MDN site but on this I think they need to review their advice :)

 Semantics and markup discussions finished  please  do what you think best
 I'm just confusing the issue get things in and we'll worry about this sort
 of detail another time.

--
Ticket URL: <https://buddypress.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/7210#comment:39>
BuddyPress Trac <http://buddypress.org/>
BuddyPress Trac